CHAPTER VII.

1802.

   The most glorious epoch for France—The First Consul's desire of
   peace—Malta ceded and kept—Bonaparte and the English journals—
   Mr. Addington's letter to the First Consul—Bonaparte prosecutes
   Peltier—Leclerc's expedition to St. Domingo—Toussaint Louverture—
   Death of Leclerc—Rochambeau, his successor, abandons St. Domingo—
   First symptoms of Bonaparte's malady—Josephine's intrigues for the
   marriage of Hortense—Falsehood contradicted.

The epoch of the peace of Amiens must be considered as the most glorious in the history of France, not excepting the splendid period of Louis XIV.'s victories and the more brilliant era of the Empire. The Consular glory was then pure, and the opening prospect was full of flattering hope; whereas those who were but little accustomed to look closely into things could discern mighty disasters lurking under the laurels of the Empire.

The proposals which the First Consul made in order to obtain peace sufficiently prove his sincere desire for it. He felt that if in the commencement of his administration he could couple his name with so hoped for an act he should ever experience the affection and gratitude of the French. I want no other proof of his sentiments than the offer he made to give up Egypt to the Grand Seignior, and to restore all the ports of the Gulf of Venice and of the Mediterranean to the States to which they had previously belonged; to surrender Malta to the order of the Knights of St. John, and even to raze its fortifications if England should think such a measure necessary for her interests. In the Indies, Ceylon was to be left to him,

—[Ceylon belonged to Holland, but was retained by England under the
   treaty of Amiens.]—

and he required the surrender of the Cape of Good Hope and all the places taken by the English in the West Indies.

England had firmly resolved to keep Malta, the Gibraltar of the Mediterranean, and the Cape of Good Hope, the caravanserai of the Indies. She was therefore unwilling to close with the proposition respecting Malta; and she said that an arrangement might be made by which it would be rendered independent both of Great Britain and France. We clearly saw that this was only a lure, and that, whatever arrangements might be entered into, England would keep Malta, because it was not to be expected that the maritime power would willingly surrender an island which commands the Mediterranean. I do not notice the discussions respecting the American islands, for they were, in my opinion, of little consequence to us.

—[It is strange that Bourrienne does not allude to one of the first
   arbitrary acts of Napoleon, the discussions on which formed part of
   those conversations between Napoleon and his brother Lucien of which
   Bourrienne complained to Josephine he knew nothing. In 1763 France
   had ceded to England the part of Louisiana on the east of the
   Mississippi, and the part on the west of that river, with New
   Orleans, to Spain. By the treaty negotiated with Spain by Lucien
   Bonaparte in 1800 her share was given back to France. On the 80th
   April 1803 Napoleon sold the whole to the United States for
   80,000,000 francs (L 3,260,000), to the intense anger of his
   brothers Joseph and Lucien. Lucien was especially proud of having
   obtained the cession for which Napoleon was, at that time, very
   anxious; but both brothers were horrified when Napoleon disclosed
   how little he cared for constitutional forms by telling them that if
   the Legislature, as his brothers threatened, would not ratify the
   treaty, he would do without the ratification; see Iung's Letter,
   tome ii. p. 128.

   Napoleon's most obvious motives were want of money and the certainty
   of the seizure of the province by England, as the rupture with her
   was now certain. But there was perhaps another cause. The States
   had already been on the point of seizing the province from Spain,
   which had interfered with their trade (Hinton's United States, p.
   435, and Thiers tome iv, p. 320).

   Of the sum to be paid, 20,000,000 were to go to the States, to cover
   the illegal seizures of American ships by the French navy, a matter
   which was not settled for many years later. The remaining
   80,000,000 were employed in the preparations for the invasion of
   England; see Thiers, tome iv. pp. 320 and 326, and Lanfrey, tome
   iii. p. 48. The transaction is a remarkable one, as forming the
   final withdrawal of France from North America (with the exception of
   some islands on the Newfoundland coast), where she had once held
   such a proud position. It also eventually made an addition to the
   number of slave States.]—

They cost more than they produce; and they will escape from us, some time or other, as all colonies ultimately do from the parent country. Our whole colonial system is absurd; it forces us to pay for colonial produce at a rate nearly double that for which it may be purchased from our neighbours.

When Lord Hawkesbury consented to evacuate Malta, on condition that it should be independent of France and Great Britain, he must have been aware that such a condition would never be fulfilled. He cared little for the order of St. John, and he should have put, by way of postscript, at the bottom of his note, "We will keep Malta in spite of you." I always told the First Consul that if he were in the situation of the English he would act the same part; and it did not require much sagacity to foretell that Malta would be the principal cause of the rupture of peace. He was of my opinion; but at that moment he thought everything depended on concluding the negotiations, and I entirely agreed with him. It happened, as was foreseen, that Malta caused the renewal of war. The English, on being called upon to surrender the island, eluded the demand, shifted about, and at last ended by demanding that Malta should be placed under the protection of the King of Naples,—that is to say, under the protection of a power entirely at their command, and to which they might dictate what they pleased. This was really too cool a piece of irony!

I will here notice the quarrel between the First Consul and the English newspapers, and give a new proof of his views concerning the freedom of the press. However, liberty of the press did once contribute to give him infinite gratification, namely, when all the London journals mentioned the transports of joy manifested in London on the arrival of General Lauriston, the bearer of the ratification of the preliminaries of peace.

The First Consul was at all times the declared enemy of the liberty of the press, and therefore he ruled the journals with a hand of iron.

—[An incident, illustrative of the great irritation which Bonaparte
   felt at the plain speaking of the English press, also shows the
   important character of Coleridge's writings in the 'Morning Post'.
   In the course of a debate in the House of Commons Fox asserted that
   the rupture of the Peace of Amiens had its origin in certain essays
   which had appeared in the Morning POST, and which were known to have
   proceeded from the pen of Coleridge. But Fox added an ungenerous
   and malicious hint that the writer was at Rome, within the reach of
   Bonaparte. The information reached the ears for which it was
   uttered, and an order was sent from Paris to compass the arrest of
   Coleridge. It was in the year 1806, when the poet was making a tour
   in Italy. The news reached him at Naples, through a brother of the
   illustrious Humboldt, as Mr. Gillman says—or in a friendly warning
   from Prince Jerome Bonaparte, as we have it on the authority of Mr.
   Cottle—and the Pope appears to have been reluctant to have a hand
   in the business, and, in fact, to have furnished him with a
   passport, if not with a carriage for flight, Coleridge eventually
   got to Leghorn, where he got a passage by an American ship bound for
   England; but his escape coming to the ears of Bonaparte, a look-out
   was kept for the ship, and she was chased by a French cruiser, which
   threw the captain into such a state of terror that he made Coleridge
   throw all his journals and papers overboard (Andrews' History of
   Journalism, vol. ii. p. 28).]—

I have often heard him say, "Were I to slacken the reins, I should not continue three months in power." He unfortunately held the same opinion respecting every other prerogative of public freedom. The silence he had imposed in France he wished, if he could, to impose in England. He was irritated by the calumnies and libels so liberally cast upon him by the English journals, and especially by one written in French, called 'L'Ambigu', conducted by Peltier, who had been the editor of the 'Actes des Apotres' in Paris. The 'Ambigu' was constantly teeming with the most violent attacks on the First Consul and the French nation. Bonaparte could never, like the English, bring himself to despise newspaper libels, and he revenged himself by violent articles which he caused to be inserted in the 'Moniteur'. He directed M. Otto to remonstrate, in an official note, against a system of calumny which he believed to be authorised by the English Government. Besides this official proceeding he applied personally to Mr. Addington, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, requesting him to procure the adoption of legislative measures against the licentious writings complained of; and, to take the earliest opportunity of satisfying his hatred against the liberty of the press, the First Consul seized the moment of signing the preliminaries to make this request.

Mr. Addington wrote a long answer to the First Consul, which I translated for him. The English Minister refuted, with great force, all the arguments which Bonaparte had employed against the press. He also informed the First Consul that, though a foreigner, it was competent in him to institute a complaint in the courts of law; but that in such case he must be content to see all the scandalous statements of which he complained republished in the report of the trial. He advised him to treat the libels with profound contempt, and do as he and others did, who attached not the slightest importance to them. I congratulate myself on having in some degree prevented a trial taking place at that time.

Things remained in this state for the moment; but after the peace of Amiens the First Consul prosecuted Pettier, whose journal was always full of violence and bitterness against him. Pettier was defended by the celebrated Mackintosh, who, according to the accounts of the time, displayed great eloquence on this occasion, yet, in spite of the ability of his counsel, he was convicted. The verdict, which public opinion considered in the light of a triumph for the defendant, was not followed up by any judgment, in consequence of the rupture of the peace occurring soon after. It is melancholy to reflect that this nervous susceptibility to the libels of the English papers contributed certainly as much as, and perhaps more than, the consideration of great political interests to the renewal of hostilities. The public would be astonished at a great many things if they could only look under the cards.

I have anticipated the rupture of the treaty of Amiens that I might not interrupt what I had to mention respecting Bonaparte's hatred of the liberty of the press. I now return to the end of the year 1801, the period of the expedition against St. Domingo.

The First Consul, after dictating to me during nearly: the whole of one night instructions for that expedition, sent for General Leclerc, and said to him in my presence, "Here, take your instructions; you have a fine opportunity for filling your purse. Go, and no longer tease me with your eternal requests for money." The friendship which Bonaparte felt for his sister Pauline had a good deal of influence in inducing him to take this liberal way of enriching her husband.

The expedition left the ports of France on the 14th of December 1801, and arrived off Cape St. Domingo on the 1st of February 1802. The fatal result of the enterprise is well known, but we are never to be cured of the folly of such absurd expeditions. In the instructions given to Leclerc everything was foreseen; but it was painful to know that the choice of one of the youngest and least capable of all the generals of the army left no hope of a successful result. The expedition to St. Domingo was one of Bonaparte's great errors. Almost every person whom he consulted endeavoured to dissuade him from it. He attempted a justification through the medium of his historians of St. Helena; but does he succeed when he says, "that he was obliged to yield to the advice of his Council of State?" He, truly, was a likely man to submit a question of war to the discussion of the Council of State, or to be guided in such an affair by any Council! We must believe that no other motive influenced the First Consul but the wish, by giving him the means of enriching himself, to get rid of a brother-in-law who had the gift of specially annoying him. The First Consul, who did not really much like this expedition, should have perhaps reflected longer on the difficulties of attempting to subdue the colony by force. He was shaken by this argument, which I often repeated to him, and he agreed with it, but the inconceivable influence which the members of his family exercised on him always overcame him.

Bonaparte dictated to me a letter for Toussaint, full of sounding words and fine promises, informing him that his two children, who had been educated in Paris, were sent back to him, offering him the title of vice-governor, and stating that he ought readily to assist in an arrangement which would contribute to reconnect the colony with the mother-country. Toussaint, who had at first shown a disposition to close with the bargain, yet feeling afraid of being deceived by the French, and probably induced by ambitious motives, resolved on war. He displayed a great deal of talent; but, being attacked before the climate had thinned the French ranks, he was unable to oppose a fresh army, numerous and inured to war. He capitulated, and retired to a plantation, which he was not to leave without Leclerc's permission. A feigned conspiracy on the part of the blacks formed a pretence for accusing Toussaint, and he was seized and sent to France.

Toussaint was brought to Paris in the beginning of August. He was sent, in the first instance, to the Temple, whence he was removed to the Chateau de Joux. His imprisonment was rigorous; few comforts were allowed him. This treatment, his recollection of the past, his separation from the world, and the effects of a strange climate, accelerated his death, which took place a few months after his arrival in France. The reports which spread concerning his death, the assertion that it was not a natural one, and that it had been caused by poison, obtained no credit. I should add that Toussaint wrote a letter to Bonaparte; but I never saw in it the expression attributed to him, "The first man of the blacks to the first man of the whites" Bonaparte acknowledged that the black leader possessed energy, courage, and great skill. I am sure that he would have rejoiced if the result of his relations with St. Domingo had been something else than the kidnaping and transportation of Toussaint.

Leclerc, after fruitless efforts to conquer the colony, was himself carried off by the yellow fever. Rochambeau succeeded him by right of seniority, and was as unsuccessful as Menou had been in Egypt. The submission of the blacks, which could only have been obtained by conciliation, he endeavoured to compel by violence. At last, in December 1803, he surrendered to an English squadron, and abandoned the island to Dessalines.

Bonaparte often experienced severe bodily pain, and I have now little doubt, from the nature of his sufferings, that they were occasioned by the commencement of that malady which terminated his life at St. Helena. These pains, of which he frequently complained, affected him most acutely on the night when he dictated to me the instructions for General Leclerc. It was very late when I conducted him to his apartment. We had just been taking a cup of chocolate, a beverage of which we always partook when our business lasted longer than one o'clock in the morning. He never took a light with him when he went up to his bedroom. I gave him my arm, and we had scarcely got beyond the little staircase which leads to the corridor, when he was rudely run against by a man who was endeavouring to escape as quickly as possible by the staircase. The First Consul did not fall because I supported him. We soon gained his chamber, where we, found Josephine, who, having heard the noise, awoke greatly alarmed. From the investigations which were immediately made it appeared that the uproar was occasioned by a fellow who had been keeping an assignation and had exceeded the usual hour for his departure.

On the 7th of January 1802 Mademoiselle Hortense was married to Louis Bonaparte. As the custom was not yet resumed of adding the religious ceremony to the civil contract, the nuptial benediction was on this occasion privately given by a priest at the house Rue de la Victoire. Bonaparte also caused the marriage of his sister Caroline,—[The wife of Murat, and the cleverest of Bonaparte's sisters.]—which had taken place two years earlier before a mayor, to be consecrated in the same manner; but he and his wife did not follow the example. Had he already, then, an idea of separating from Josephine, and therefore an unwillingness to render a divorce more difficult by giving his marriage a religious sanction? I am rather inclined to think, from what he said to me, that his neglecting to take a part in the religious ceremony arose from indifference.

Bonaparte said at St. Helena, speaking of Louis and Hortense, that "they loved each other when they married: they desired to be united. The marriage was also the result of Josephine's intrigues, who found her account in it." I will state the real facts. Louis and Hortense did not love one another at all. That is certain. The First Consul knew it, just as he well knew that Hortense had a great inclination for Duroc, who did not fully return it. The First Consul agreed to their union, but Josephine was troubled by such a marriage, and did all she could to prevent it. She often spoke to me about it, but rather late in the day. She told me that her brothers-in law were her declared enemies, that I well knew their intrigues, and that I well knew there was no end to the annoyances they made her undergo. In fact, I did know all this perfectly. She kept on repeating to me that with this projected marriage she would not have any support; that Duroc was nothing except by the favour of Bonaparte; that he had neither fortune, fame, nor reputation, and that he could be no help to her against the well-known ill-will of the brothers of Bonaparte. She wanted some assurance for the future. She added that her husband was very fond of Louis, and that if she had the good fortune to unite him to her daughter this would be a counterpoise to the calumnies and persecutions of her other brothers-in-law. I answered her that she had concealed her intentions too long from me, and that I had promised my services to the young people, and the more willingly as I knew the favourable opinion of the First Consul, who had often said to me, "My wife has done well; they suit one another, they shall marry one another. I like Duroc; he is of good family. I have rightly given Caroline to Murat, and Pauline to Leclerc, and I can well give Hortense to Duroc, who is a fine fellow. He is worth more than the others. He is now general of a division there is nothing against this marriage. Besides, I have other plans for Louis." In speaking to Madame Bonaparte I added that her daughter burst into tears when spoken to about her marriage with Louis.

The First Consul had sent a brevet of general of division to Duroc by a special courier, who went to Holland, through which the newly-made general had to pass on his return from St. Petersburg, where, as I have already said, he had been sent to compliment the Emperor Alexander on his accession to the throne. The First Consul probably paid this compliment to Duroc in the belief that the marriage would take place.

During Duroc's absence the correspondence of the lovers passed, by their consent, through my hands. Every night I used to make one in a party at billiards, at which Hortense played very well. When I told her, in a whisper, that I had got a letter for her, she would immediately leave off playing and run to her chamber, where I followed and gave her Duroc's epistle. When she opened it her eyes would fill with tears, and it was some time before she could return to the salon. All was useless for her. Josephine required a support in the family against the family. Seeing her firm resolution, I promised to no longer oppose her wishes, which I could not disapprove, but I told her I could only maintain silence and neutrality in these little debates, and she seemed satisfied.

When we were at Malmaison those intrigues continued. At the Tuileries the same conduct was pursued, but then the probability of success was on Duroc's side; I even congratulated him on his prospects, but he received my compliments in a very cold manner. In a few days after Josephine succeeded in changing the whole face of affairs. Her heart was entirely set on the marriage of Louis with her daughter; and prayers, entreaties, caresses, and all those little arts which she so well knew how to use, were employed to win the First Consul to her purpose.

On the 4th of January the First Consul, after dinner, entered our cabinet, where I was employed. "Where is Duroc?" he inquired.—"He has gone to the opera, I believe."—"Tell him, as soon as he returns, that I have promised Hortense to him, and he shall have her. But I wish the marriage to take place in two days at the latest. I will give him 500,000 francs, and name him commandant of the eighth military division; but he must set out the day after his marriage with his wife for Toulon. We must live apart; I want no son-in-law at home. As I wish to come to some conclusion, let me know to-night whether this plan will satisfy him."—"I think it will not."—"Very well! then she shall marry Louis."—"Will she like that?"—"She must like it." Bonaparte gave me these directions in a very abrupt manner, which made me think that some little domestic warfare had been raging, and that to put an end to it he had come to propose his ultimatum. At half-past ten in the evening Duroc returned; I reported to him, word for word, the proposition of the First Consul. "Since it has come to that, my good friend," said he, "tell him he may keep his daughter for me. I am going to see the ——-," and, with an indifference for which I cannot account, he took his hat and went off.

—[Duroc eventually married a Mademoiselle Hervae d'Almenara, the
   daughter of a Spanish banker, who was later Minister of Joseph, and
   was created Marquis of Abruenara. The lady was neither handsome nor
   amiable, but she possessed a vast fortune, and Bonaparte himself
   solicited her hand for his aide de camp. After the death of Duroc
   his widow married a M. Fabvier, and Napoleon gave his Duchy of
   Frioul to his daughter.]—

The First Consul, before going to bed, was informed of Duroc's reply, and Josephine received from him the promise that Louis and Hortense should be married. The marriage took place a few days after, to the great regret of Hortense, and probably to the satisfaction of Duroc. Louis submitted to have forced on him as a wife a woman who had hitherto avoided him as much as possible. She always manifested as much indifference for him as he displayed repugnance for her, and those sentiments have not been effaced.

—[The marriage of Louis Bonaparte took place on the 7th January.
   The bride and bridegroom were exceedingly dull, and Mademoiselle
   Hortense wept during the whole of the ceremony. Josephine, knowing
   that this union, which commenced so inauspiciously, was her own
   work, anxiously endeavoured to establish a more cordial feeling
   between her daughter and son-in-law. But all her efforts were vain,
   and the marriage proved a very unhappy one (Memoirs de Constant).

   Napoleon III. was the son of the Queen of Holland (Hortense
   Beauharnais).]—

Napoleon said at St. Helena that he wished to unite Louis with a niece of Talleyrand. I can only say that I never heard a word of this niece, either from himself, his wife, or his daughter; and I rather think that at that time the First Consul was looking after a royal alliance for Louis. He often expressed regret at the precipitate marriages of his sisters. It should be recollected that we were now in the year which saw the Consulship for life established, and which, consequently, gave presage of the Empire. Napoleon said truly to the companions of his exile that "Louis' marriage was the result of Josephine's intrigues," but I cannot understand how he never mentioned the intention he once had of uniting Hortense to Duroc. It has been erroneously stated that the First Consul believed that he reconciled the happiness of his daughter with his policy. Hortense did not love Louis, and dreaded this marriage. There was no hope of happiness for her, and the event has proved this. As for the policy of the First Consul, it is not easy to see how it was concerned with the marriage of Louis to Hortense, and in any case the grand policy which professed so loudly to be free from all feminine influences would have been powerless against the intrigues of Josephine, for at this time at the Tuileries the boudoir was often stronger than the cabinet. Here I am happy to have it in my power to contradict most formally and most positively certain infamous insinuations which have prevailed respecting Bonaparte and Hortense. Those who have asserted that Bonaparte ever entertained towards Hortense any other sentiments than those of a father-in-law for a daughter-in-law have, as the ancient knights used to say, "lied in their throats." We shall see farther on what he said to me on this subject, but it is never too soon to destroy such a base calumny. Authors unworthy of belief have stated, without any proof, that not only was there this criminal liaison, but they have gone so far as to say that Bonaparte was the father of the eldest son of Hortense. It is a lie, a vile lie. And yet the rumour has spread through all France and all Europe. Alas! has calumny such powerful charms that, once they are submitted to, their yoke cannot be broken?

—[Bourrienne's account of this marriage, and his denial of the vile
   calumny about Napoleon, is corroborated by Madame Rémusat. After
   saying that Hortense had refused to marry the son of Rewbell and
   also the Comte de Nun, she goes on: "A short time afterwards Duroc,
   then aide de camp to the Consul, and already noted by him, fell in
   love with Hortense. She returned the feeling, and believed she had
   found that other half of herself which she sought. Bonaparte looked
   favourably on their union, but Madame Bonaparte in her turn was
   inflexible. 'My daughter,' said she, 'must marry a gentleman or a
   Bonaparte.' Louis was then thought of. He had no fancy for
   Hortense; defeated the Beauharnais family, and had a supreme
   contempt for his sister-in-law. But as he was silent, he was
   believed to be gentle; and as he was severe by character, he was
   believed to be upright. Madame Louis told me afterwards that at the
   news of this arrangement she experienced violent grief. Not only
   was she forbidden to think of the man she loved, but she was about
   to be given to another of whom she had a secret distrust" (Rémusat,
   tome i. p. 156). For the cruel treatment of Hortense by Louis see
   the succeeding pages of Rémusat. As for the vile scandal about
   Hortense and Napoleon, there is little doubt that it was spread by
   the Bonapartist family for interested motives. Madame Louis became
   enceinte soon after her marriage. The Bonapartists, and especially
   Madame Murat (Caroline); had disliked this marriage because Joseph
   having only daughters, it was forseen that the first son of Louis
   and the grandson of Madame Bonaparte would be the object of great
   interest. They therefore spread the revolting story that this was
   the result of a connection of the First Consul with his
   daughter-in-law, encouraged by the mother herself. "The public
   willingly believed this suspicion.' Madame Murat told Louis," etc.
   (Rémusat, tome i, p. 169). This last sentence is corroborated by
   Miot de Melito (tome ii. p. 170), who, speaking of the later
   proposal of Napoleon to adopt this child, says that Louis
   "remembered the damaging stories which ill-will had tried to spread
   among the public concerning Hortense Beauharnais before he married
   her, and although a comparison of the date of his marriage with
   that of the birth of his son must have shown him that these tales
   were unfounded, he felt that they would be revived by the adoption
   of this child by the First Consul." Thus this wretched story did
   harm in every way. The conduct of Josephine must be judged with
   leniency, engaged as she was in a desperate struggle to maintain
   her own marriage,—a struggle she kept up with great skill; see
   Metternich, tome ii. p. 296. "she baffled all the calculations,
   all the manoeuvres of her adversaries." But she was foolish enough
   to talk in her anger as if she believed some of the disgraceful
   rumours of Napoleon. "Had he not seduced his sisters, one after
   the other?" (Rémusat, tome i. p. 204). As to how far this scandal
   was really believed by the brothers of Napoleon, see Iung's Lucien
   (tome ii. pp. 268-269), where Lucien describes Louis as coming
   three times to him for advice as to his marriage with Hortense,
   both brothers referring to this rumour. The third time Louis
   announces he is in love with Hortense. "You are in love? Why the
   devil, then, do you come to me for advice? If so, forget what has
   been rumoured, and what I have advised you. Marry, and may God
   bless you."

   Thiers (tome iii. p. 308) follows Bourrienne's account. Josephine,
   alluding to Louis Bonaparte, said, "His family have maliciously
   informed him of the disgraceful stories which have been spread on
   the conduct of my daughter and on the birth of her son. Hate
   assigns this child to Napoleon." (Rémusat, tome i, p. 206). The
   child in question was Napoleon Charles (1802-1807).]—