67 — To William Bankes 1

Southwell, March 6, 1807.

Dear Bankes, — Your critique is valuable for many reasons: in the first place, it is the only one in which flattery has borne so slight a part; in the

next

, I am

cloyed

with insipid compliments. I have a better opinion of your judgment and ability than your

feelings

. Accept my most sincere thanks for your kind decision, not less welcome, because totally unexpected. With regard to a more exact estimate, I need not remind you how few of the

best poems

, in our language, will stand the test of

minute

or

verbal

criticism: it can, therefore, hardly be expected the effusions of a boy (and most of these pieces have been produced at an early period) can derive much merit either from the subject or composition. Many of them were written under great depression of spirits, and during severe indisposition:— hence the gloomy turn of the ideas. We coincide in opinion that the "

poësies érotiques

" are the most exceptionable; they were, however, grateful to the

deities

, on whose altars they were offered — more I seek not.

The

portrait of Pomposus

2

was drawn at Harrow, after a

long sitting

; this accounts for the resemblance, or rather the

caricatura

. He is

your

friend, he

never was mine

— for both our sakes I shall be silent on this head.

The

collegiate

rhymes

3

are not personal — one of the notes may appear so, but could not be omitted. I have little doubt they will be deservedly abused — a just punishment for my unfilial treatment of so excellent an Alma Mater.

I

sent you no copy, lest

we

should be placed in the situation of

Gil Blas

and the

Archbishop

of Grenada

4

; though running some hazard from the experiment, I wished your

verdict

to be unbiassed. Had my "

Libellus

" been presented previous to your letter, it would have appeared a species of bribe to purchase compliment. I feel no hesitation in saying, I was more anxious to hear your critique, however severe, than the praises of the

million

.

On

the same day I was honoured with the encomiums of

Mackenzie

, the celebrated author of the

Man of Feeling

5

Whether

his

approbation or

yours

elated me most, I cannot decide.

You will receive my

Juvenilia

, — at least all yet published. I have a large volume in manuscript, which may in part appear hereafter; at present I have neither time nor inclination to prepare it for the press. In the spring I shall return to Trinity, to dismantle my rooms, and bid you a final adieu. The

Cam

will not be much increased by my

tears

on the occasion. Your further remarks, however

caustic

or bitter, to a palate vitiated with the

sweets of adulation

, will be of service. Johnson has shown us

that no poetry

is perfect; but to correct mine would be an Herculean labour. In fact I never looked beyond the moment of composition, and published merely at the request of my friends. Notwithstanding so much has been said concerning the "Genus irritabile vatum," we shall never quarrel on the subject — poetic fame is by no means the "acme" of my wishes. — Adieu. Yours ever,

Byron

.

Footnote 1:

  William John Bankes, of Kingston Lacy, Dorsetshire, was Byron's friend, possibly at Harrow, though his name does not occur in the school lists, certainly at Trinity College, Cambridge (B.A. 1808). He represented Truro from 1810 to 1812, when he left England on his Eastern travels. At Philæ he discovered an obelisk, the geometrical elevation and inscriptions of which he published in 1820. In Mesopotamia he encountered John Silk Buckingham, whom he afterwards charged with making use of his notes in his

Travels

, a statement, found to be libellous, which (October 19, 1826) cost Bankes £400 in damages. He also travelled with Giovanni Finati, a native of Ferrara, who, under the assumed name of Mahomet, made the campaigns against the Wahabees for the recovery of Mecca and Medina. Finati's Italian

Narrative

was translated by Bankes, to whom it is dedicated by his "attached and faithful servant Hadjee Mahomet," and published in 1830. In 1822 Bankes was elected M.P. for Cambridge University, but lost his seat to Sir J. Copley in 1826. At a bye-election in 1827, he was again unsuccessful. His candidature gave occasion to Macaulay's squib, which appeared in the

Times

for May 14, 1827,

A Country Clergyman's Trip to Cambridge

.

"A letter — and free — bring it here:
I have no correspondent who franks.
No! Yes! Can it be? Why, my dear,
'Tis our glorious, our Protestant Bankes.

'Dear Sir as I know your desire
That the Church should receive due protection,
I humbly presume to require
Your aid at the Cambridge election,'"etc., etc.

Bankes subsequently represented Marlborough (1829-1832) and Dorsetshire (1833-1834). He was Byron's "collegiate pastor, and master and patron," "ruled the roast" at Trinity, "or, rather, the

roasting

, and was father of all mischief" (Byron to Murray, October 12, 1820). "William Bankes," Byron told Lady Blessington (

Conversations

, p. 172), "is another of my early friends. He is very clever, very original, and has a fund of information: he is also very good-natured, but he is not much of a flatterer." Bankes died at Venice in 1855.

cross-reference: return to Footnote 3 of Letter 84

Footnote 2:

  Dr. Butler, Head-master of Harrow. (See page 58,

note

1.)

Footnote 3:

  "Thoughts suggested by a College Examination" (

Poems

, vol. i. pp. 28-31); and "Granta, A Medley" (

Poems

, vol. i. pp. 56-62).

Footnote 4:

  Alluding to

Gil Blas

, bk. vii. chap, iv., where Gil Blas ventures to criticize the Archbishop's work, and is dismissed for his candour.

"Adieu, monsieur Gil Blas; Je vous souhaite toutes sortes de prosperités, avec un peu plus de goût."

cross-reference: return to Footnote 2 of Letter 158

Footnote 5:

 The praise was worth having. Henry Mackenzie (1745-1831) was not only the author of the lackadaisical

Man of Feeling

, but in real life a shrewd, hard-headed man. As a novelist, he wrote

The Man of Feeling

(1771),

The Man of Honour

(1773), and

Julia de Roubigne

(1777). As a playwright, he produced four plays, none of which succeeded. As an essayist, he contributed to the

Mirror

(1779-80) and the

Lounger

(1785-86). As a political writer, he supported Pitt, and was rewarded by the comptrollership of taxes. An original member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, many of his papers appear in its

Transactions

. In Edinburgh society he was "the life of the company," a connecting link on the literary side between David Hume, Walter Scott, and Lord Cockburn, and in all matters of sport a fund of anecdotes and reminiscences.

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook